REG - Competition and Mkts - Car industry settles competition law case

TOYOTA MOTORAnnouncement

02/04/2025 01:45

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250401:nRSA2133Da&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 2133D  Competition and Markets Authority  01 April 2025

Car industry settles competition law case

Car manufacturers and industry bodies have reached a settlement with the CMA
after admitting to breaking competition law in relation to vehicle recycling,
and related advertising claims.

·    Ten manufacturers - BMW, Ford, Jaguar Land Rover, Peugeot Citroen,
Mitsubishi, Nissan, Renault, Toyota, Vauxhall and Volkswagen - and 2 trade
bodies have been fined a total of £77,688,917

·    These manufacturers illegally agreed not to compete against one
another when advertising what percentage of their cars can be recycled

·    The manufacturers also illegally colluded to avoid paying third
parties to recycle their customers' scrap cars

Following an investigation
(https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/suspected-anti-competitive-conduct-in-relation-to-the-recycling-of-end-of-life-vehicles)
by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), 10 manufacturers and 2 trade
bodies have admitted their involvement in the illegal behaviour and agreed to
pay fines totalling over £77 million.

Mercedes-Benz, which was also involved in these agreements, is exempt from
paying a financial penalty as it alerted the CMA to its participation via the
authority's leniency policy.

The European Commission (EC) launched a parallel probe alongside the CMA in
March 2022. The EC has today issued its own decision imposing fines for
breaches of EU law.

Advertising claims

Amongst other sustainability information, manufacturers are legally required
to include details on recyclability in their advertising materials, so
customers can take this into account when considering a vehicle's green
credentials before buying.

In this case, the CMA found that all manufacturers illegally agreed that they
would not advertise if their vehicles went above the minimum recyclability
requirement of 85% (even if the actual percentage was higher). With the
exception of Renault, the manufacturers also agreed not to share information
with their customers about the percentage of recycled material used in their
vehicles.

Failing to compete against one another in this way is illegal. It also meant
customers buying a car from one of these manufacturers were unable to fully
compare the green credentials of vehicles when buying, which could have
affected their choice.  This kind of behaviour may also lower the incentive
for companies to invest in green initiatives.

Most manufacturers took part in this practice from May 2002 to September 2017,
with Jaguar Land Rover joining in September 2008. The agreement was set out in
a document called the 'ELV Charta' - sometimes referred to as a "gentleman's
agreement" - and sought to "avoid a competitive race" amongst the
manufacturers in relation to advertising claims of this kind. This agreement
was referenced in emails, internal documents and meeting minutes, and certain
manufacturers challenged others when they breached this agreement.

Buyers' cartel

Vehicle manufactures must offer their customers a free service for recycling
their old or written-off vehicles having no or negative market value (known in
the industry as 'end-of-life vehicles' or ELVs), and this service is regularly
outsourced to third parties.

The CMA's investigation revealed that certain manufacturers were involved in
what is known as a 'buyers' cartel' in relation to this service.

From April 2004 to May 2018, 8 manufacturers - BMW, Ford, Mercedes-Benz,
Peugeot Citroen, Renault, Toyota, Vauxhall and Volkswagen - agreed amongst
themselves that they would not pay companies to handle the recycling of their
customers' ELVs. This effectively meant the companies providing this service
were unable to negotiate a price with manufacturers.

While companies supplying this recycling service can often make money from
ELVs, for example, by retrieving and selling the used parts and raw materials,
how profitable it is can vary depending on the price of scrap metal at any
given time.

Other companies and bodies later joined the unlawful agreement, including the
European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA), the Society of Motor
Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT), Nissan and Mitsubishi in 2006, and Jaguar
Land Rover in 2016.

Colluding to agree prices in this manner is illegal. It can impact the
incentives for other companies to invest - for example, in better and greener
technologies.

Trade association involvement

Two trade associations, ACEA and the SMMT, were involved in both illegal
agreements.

The manufacturers used ACEA meetings to facilitate these arrangements, with
the association itself chairing meetings and intervening when manufacturers
acted outside of the terms.

The SMMT also attended these meetings and likewise became involved by settling
a handful of disputes.

Lucilia Falsarella Pereira, Senior Director of Competition Enforcement at the
CMA, said:

"Agreeing with competitors the prices you'll pay for a service or colluding to
restrict competition is illegal and this can extend to how you advertise your
products. This kind of collusion can limit consumers' ability to make informed
choices and lower the incentive for companies to invest in new initiatives.
 

"Today's fines show our commitment to taking action when competition law is
broken. In accordance with our leniency policy, we've given discounts to those
who came forward with information and co-operated at an early stage, which
helps to get the swiftest outcomes.

"We recognise that competing businesses may want to work together to help the
environment - in those cases our door is open to help them do so."

Settlement and fines

All of the car makers and industry bodies, except for Mercedes-Benz (which has
been granted immunity from penalties), have now settled with the CMA - meaning
they have admitted to taking part in illegal behaviour and agreed to pay fines
totalling £77,688,917.

Following the launch of the CMA's investigation, the SMMT, Stellantis (the
current owner of Peugeot Citroen, Vauxhall and Opel) and Mitsubishi approached
the CMA for leniency and, as a result, have received a percentage reduction to
their fines.

The fines for each company/industry body are:

 Car manufacturer / Industry body                                            Fine for advertising infringement  Fine for buyers' cartel infringement  Total

                                                                                                                                                      (including any % reductions for leniency and/or settlement)
 BMW                                                                         £10,660,781                        £400,144                              £11,060,925

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 Ford                                                                        £12,949,433                        £5,592,496                            £18,541,929

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 Jaguar Land Rover                                                           £4,575,812                         £50,592                               £4,626,404

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 Peugeot Citroen                                                             £2,952,867                         £2,237,080                            £5,189,948

 (and owner Stellantis)

                                                                                                                                                      (45% leniency reduction and 20% settlement reduction)
 Mitsubishi                                                                  £746,465                           £152,066                              £898,531

                                                                                                                                                      (25% leniency reduction and 20% settlement reduction)
 Nissan and Renault (formerly the same business group)                       £6,348,132 (shared fine)           £3,631,695                            £9,979,826

(shared fine)

                                                                                                                                                      (shared total)

                                                                             £2,800,646

                                                                             (sole liability for Nissan)                                              and £2,800,646

                                                                                                                                                      (sole liability for Nissan)

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 Toyota                                                                      £3,941,996                         £560,764                              £4,502,760

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 Vauxhall and Opel                                                           £1,510,715                         £670,412                              £2,181,127

                                                                                                                                                      (45% leniency reduction and 20% settlement reduction)
 Vauxhall and Opel (and former owner                                         £1,829,904                         £1,037,145                            £2,867,049

 General Motors)

                                                                                                                                                      (45% leniency reduction and 20% settlement reduction)

 (GM is fined only as owner of both firms during part of the infringement)
 Vauxhall and Opel (and owner Stellantis)                                    £22,704                            £100,369                              £123,072

 (Stellantis is fined only as owner of both firms during part of the                                                                                  (45% leniency reduction and 20% settlement reduction)
 infringement)
 Volkswagen                                                                  £13,472,404                        £1,283,496                            £14,755,900

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 ACEA                                                                        £91,200                            £22,800                               £114,000

                                                                                                                                                      (20% settlement reduction)
 SMMT                                                                        £31,200                            £15,600                               £46,800

                                                                                                                                                      (35% leniency reduction and

20% settlement reduction)
                                                                                                                TOTAL                                 £77,688,917

 

The manufacturers and industry bodies have until 2 June 2025 to pay their
fines.

Notes to editors

1.   In its decision, the CMA has found 2 single and continuous 'by object'
infringements of section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (i.e. that the
conduct had, as its object, the restriction or distortion of competition
within the UK). The CMA has not made any finding as to whether the conduct at
issue had the effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition, or
any effect on customers.

2.   The CMA's decision concerns the restriction of competition in the UK,
whereas the EC's decision is concerned with the restriction of competition in
the EU (excluding the UK). The EC's investigation focused on the same parties
as the CMA, but did not include the SMMT.

3.   Under the CMA's leniency policy
(https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cartels-confess-and-apply-for-leniency) , a
business that has been involved in cartel activity may be granted immunity
from penalties or a reduction in penalty in return for reporting the cartel
activity and assisting the CMA with its investigation.

4.   When deciding the financial penalties, the CMA took into account a
number of factors, including the seriousness of the illegal behaviour, its
duration and each manufacturer's size and UK turnover in the relevant market.
Importantly, differences in fines should not be taken to indicate relative
culpability.

5.   A buyers' cartel is where members of a cartel - or companies buying a
service or product - agree amongst themselves how they will individually
interact with suppliers. In this case, the manufacturers involved mutually
agreed the price that they would each individually pay for recycling services
(zero), thereby preventing the providers of recycling services from
negotiating a higher price.

6.   All trade associations must operate within the law and the CMA created
guidance to help them navigate their obligations - more information can be
found here: What do trade associations need to know about competition law?
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/competition-law-dos-and-donts-for-trade-associations/what-do-trade-associations-need-to-know-about-competition-law)

7.   During the period of the agreements, Renault and Nissan formed part of
the same business group. Since 8 November 2023, they no longer form part of
the same business group. They are therefore jointly and severally liable for
part of the fine, with Nissan being solely liable for an additional amount (in
relation to the advertising infringement).

8.   The CMA has created guidance on how competing businesses can
collaborate within the law, specifically when it comes to green agreements:
Green Agreements Guidance
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-environmental-sustainability-agreements)
.

9.   Anyone who has information about a cartel is encouraged to call the CMA
cartels hotline on 020 3738 6888 or email cartelshotline@cma.gov.uk.

10. All enquiries from journalists should be directed to the CMA press office
by email on press@cma.gov.uk or by phone on 020 3738 6460.

11. All enquiries from the general public should be directed to the CMA's
General Enquiries team on general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk or 020 3738 6000.

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  IRSUAOVRVAUSRAR