REG - Thor Energy PLC - Mineralisation at Edna Mae Prospect
24/06/2024 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20240624:nRSX4904Ta&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 4904T Thor Energy PLC 24 June 2024
24 June 2024
Thor Energy PLC
("Thor" or the "Company)
Sampling returns up to 5,424ppm (0.54 %) U(3)O(8), 1.6 % V(2)O(5) and 2.74 %
Cu.
Edna Mae Prospect- Wedding Bell and Radium Mountain Projects, USA
The directors of Thor Energy Plc ("Thor") (AIM, ASX: THR, OTCQB: THORF) are
pleased to provide an exploration update on the regional surface sampling
program on the Company's 100% owned Wedding Bell and Radium Mountain Projects,
located in the uranium-vanadium mining district of the Uravan Mineral Belt,
southwest Colorado, USA (Figure 1 and Figure 3).
Highlights:
§ Rock Chip sampling at Edna Mae Prospect returned up to 5,424 ppm (0.54 %) U(3)O(8), 1.6 % V(2)O(5) and 2.74 % Cu.
§ Following on from Thor's 2023 Airborne Radiometric survey, a regional reconnaissance surface sampling program consisting of mapping and rock sampling is progressing across the Wedding Bell Project, assessing all first-order anomalies for future drill testing (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Previously reported rock samples returned up to 1.25% U(3)O(8) at Rim Rock (WR-016) and 3.87 % V(2)O(5) at Jack Knife (WR-20) (Figure 1) (
ASX/AIM: 20 July 2020 (https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/LSE_news/2020/07/21/Thormining_14759196.pdf)
).
§ Edna Mae rock sample assay results include:
Sample No. U(3)O(8) ppm U(3)O(8) % V(2)O(5) % Cu % Ag g/t Sample Type
WBNG001 598 0.06 1.60 2.74 100 Dump
WBNG002 5424 0.54 1.38 0.31 6.4 Dump
WBNG003 2235 0.22 0.69 0.52 21.3 Adit wall
§ The Edna Mae prospect lies in the southern portion of Thor's mining claims (Figure 2), with the copper and uranium-vanadium mineralisation within altered, bitumen spotted Jurassic sandstones of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation (Photo 1 & 2). Mineralisation sits in the lower first Rim of the Salt Wash Sandstone at a similar stratigraphic position to Section 23 and Groundhog prospects.
§ Edna Mae lies on the edge of Paradox Copper Belt, which includes the
producing Lisbon Valley Copper Mine. The sediment-hosted copper mineralisation
is believed to be a later, younger event to the uranium mineralisation.
§ Preparations are underway for 2024 drilling programs (infill and extension)
at Rim Rock and Groundhog mine areas, with reconnaissance surface geochemical
sampling continuing throughout the Wedding Bell Project.
Nicole Galloway Warland, Managing Director of Thor Energy, commented:
"The presence of high-grade copper with the uranium-vanadium assay results at
the Edna Mae Prospect is very promising. The Edna Mae Prospect sits on the
edge of the Paradox Copper Belt, which hosts the producing Lisbon Valley
Copper Mine.
"We are continuing our regional reconnaissance surface sampling program with
exciting high-grade results and building additional drill targets to our
priority Rim Rock and Groundhog prospects.
"2024 drilling preparations are in progress, with the intention of maiden
drilling at Vanadium King Project, and we look forward to updating the market
in due course."
Figure 1: Surface Rock Sampling Results including Edna Mae, across the Wedding
Bell ad Radium Mountain Projects, Colorado
RECONNAISSANCE SURFACE SAMPLING:
Reconnaissance mapping and surface rock sampling across the Wedding Bell
Project are continuing to systematically assess and prioritising historic
workings and geophysical anomalies, identified by Thor's 2023 Radiometric
Survey (ASX/AIM: 27 July 2023
(https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/THR/uranium-targets-identified/16058031)
) for future drill testing (Figures 1 and 2).
Previously reported rock samples returned up to 1.25% U(3)O(8) at Rim Rock
(WR-016) and 3.87 % V(2)O(5) at Jack Knife (WR-20) (Figure 1) (ASX/AIM: 20
July 2020). Refer to Table A for rock chip sample results to date. Of the
ten-plus areas that have been assessed, only two areas have been drill-tested
by Thor to date (Rim Rock and Groundhog).
Edna Mae Prospect
Edna Mae was identified as a geophysical anomaly in 2023, and is located in
the southern portion of the Wedding Bell mining claims approximately 1km east
of Section 23 and along strike of Groundhog (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Recent Rock Chip sampling at Edna Mae Prospect returned up to 5,425ppm (0.54 %) U(3)O(8), 1.6 % V(2)O(5), 2.74 % Cu and 100g/t Ag. Although elevated copper values have been noted and used as pathfinder elements in drilling at Groundhog, Rim Rock and Section 23, this is the first high-grade copper value reported.
The copper and uranium-vanadium mineralisation is within altered, bitumen spotted Jurassic sandstones of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation (Photo 1 & 2). Mineralisation sits in the lower first Rim of the Salt Wash Sandstone at a similar stratigraphic position to Section 23 prospect.
Edna Mae lies on the edge of Paradox Copper Belt, which includes the producing
Lisbon Valley Copper Mine, Utah. The sediment-hosted copper mineralisation is
believed to be a later, younger event to the uranium mineralisation (Figure
3). Further work is needed to understand the copper distribution, and its
relationship and distribution relative to the uranium-vanadium mineralisation.
Edna Mae rock sample assay results include:
Sample No. U(3)O(8) ppm U(3)O(8) % V(2)O(5) % Cu % Ag g/t Sample Type
WBNG001 598 0.06 1.60 2.74 100 Dump
WBNG002 5424 0.54 1.38 0.31 6.4 Dump
WBNG003 2235 0.22 0.69 0.52 21.3 Adit wall
Next Steps and Upcoming News Flow:
§ Continuing our reconnaissance mapping and surface sampling program across
tenure, to build and prioritise future drill targets. There remain several
unsampled radiometric anomalies to assess (Figure 3).
§ Detailed mineralisation and geological interpretations combining the 2022
and 2023 drilling results.
§ 2024 reverse circulation and diamond resource drilling (infill and
extension) at Rim Rock and Groundhog mine areas.
§ Maiden drilling at Vanadium King, Utah.
Figure 2: Radiometric image (U2/Th ratio) draped over Digital Elevation Model
(DEM) showing uranium anomalies in red, green and light blue with Rock Chip
samples collected to date
Table A: Rock Sample Assay Results for Wedding Bell Project
Prospect Sample No. Easting Northing U(3)O(8) ppm U(3)O(8) % V(2)O(5) % Cu % Ag g/t Sample Type
Edna Mae WBNG001 689628 4222808 598 0.06 1.60 2.74 100 Dump
Edna Mae WBNG002 689628 4222807 5424 0.54 1.38 0.31 6.4 Dump
Edna Mae WBNG003 689706 4222727 2235 0.22 0.69 0.52 21.3 Adit wall
Ground Hog WR-001 687927 4223836 5188 0.52 1.82 NA NA Outcrop
Ground Hog WR-002 688030 4223849 943 0.09 1.11 NA NA Outcrop
Rim Rock WR-003 687660 4225839 8844 0.88 1.87 NA NA Adit wall
Rim Rock WR-004 687660 4225839 10023 1 1.30 NA NA Grab
Wedding Bell WR-005 687333 4224766 4363 0.44 0.38 NA NA Grab
Wedding Bell WR-006 687202 4224797 2358 0.24 0.67 NA NA Grab
Big Bull WR-007 692453 4226633 1179 0.12 0.74 NA NA Outcrop
Big Bull WR-008 692468 4226632 472 0.05 0.35 NA NA Outcrop
Lark Mine WR-009 691031 4226911 2358 0.24 0.25 NA NA Dump
Lark Mine WR-010 690763 4226921 11674 1.17 1.89 NA NA Dump
Lark Mine WR-011 690468 4226608 3891 0.39 1.23 NA NA Dump
Diana Mine WR-012 690142 4225830 11084 1.11 2.32 NA NA Dump
Babe Ruth WR-013 689730 4225628 118 0.01 1.04 NA NA Outcrop
Babe Ruth WR-014 689732 4225603 3420 0.34 2.62 NA NA Dump
unnamed WR-015 688347 4225808 9080 0.91 0.61 NA NA Grab
Rim Rock WR-016 687627 4225392 12500 1.25 0.97 NA NA Dump
Rim Rock WR-017 687660 4225839 1415 0.14 2.12 NA NA Adit wall
Rim Rock WR-018 687731 4225668 472 0.05 2.39 NA NA Outcrop
Jack Knife WR-019 687108 4224016 236 0.02 1.20 NA NA Pit Wall
Jack Knife WR-020 687081 4223998 6839 0.68 3.87 NA NA Pit Wall
Groundhog WR-021 687921 4223833 943 0.09 0.51 NA NA Outcrop
Note
Coordinates are in WGS 84 Zone 12
NA - Not Analysed for Copper or Silver
Figure 3: Uranium and Vanadium Project Location Map within the Uravan Mineral
Belt
The Board of Thor Energy Plc has approved this announcement and authorised its
release.
For further information, please contact:
Thor Energy PLC
Nicole Galloway Warland, Managing Director Tel: +61 (8) 7324 1935
Ray Ridge, CFO / Company Secretary Tel: +61 (8) 7324 1935
WH Ireland Limited (Nominated Adviser and Joint Broker) Tel: +44 (0) 207 220 1666
Antonio Bossi / Darshan Patel / Isaac Hooper
SI Capital Limited (Joint Broker) Tel: +44 (0) 1483 413 500
Nick Emerson
Yellow Jersey (Financial PR) thor@yellowjerseypr.com
Dom Barretto / Shivantha Thambirajah / Bessie Elliot Tel: +44 (0) 20 3004 9512
About Thor Energy Plc
The Company is predominantly focused on uranium and energy metals that are
crucial in the shift to a 'green' energy economy. Thor has several highly
prospective projects that give shareholders exposure to uranium, vanadium,
copper, tungsten, lithium, nickel and gold, located in the favourable mining
jurisdictions of Australia and the USA.
Thor holds 100% interest in three uranium and vanadium projects (Wedding Bell,
Radium Mountain and Vanadium King) in the Uravan Belt region of Colorado and
Utah, with historical high-grade uranium and vanadium drilling and production
results.
At Alford East in South Australia, Thor has earnt an 80% interest in oxide
copper deposits considered amenable to extraction via In-Situ Recovery
techniques (ISR). In January 2021, Thor announced an Inferred Mineral Resource
Estimate¹.
Thor also holds a 26.3% interest in a private Australian copper development
company EnviroCopper Limited (ECL), which Kapunda copper mine and the Alford
West copper project, both situated in South Australia, and both considered
amenable to recovery by way of ISR.²³ Alligator Energy recently invested
A$0.9M for a 7.8% interest in ECL with the rights to gain a 50.1% interest by
investing a further A$10.1m over four years.
Thor holds 100% of the advanced Molyhil tungsten project, including measured,
indicated and inferred resources⁴, in the Northern Territory of Australia,
which was awarded Major Project Status by the Northern Territory government in
July 2020. Thor executed a A$8m Farm-in and Funding Agreement with
Investigator Resources Limited (ASX: IVR) to accelerate exploration at the
Molyhil Project on 24 November 2022.(5)
Thor owns 100% of the Ragged Range Project, comprising 92 km(2) of exploration
licences with highly encouraging early-stage gold and nickel results in the
Pilbara region of Western Australia.
For further information on Thor Energy and to see an overview of its projects,
please visit the Company's website at https://thorenergyplc.com/
(https://thorenergyplc.com/) .
Notes
(1)
https://thorenergyplc.com/investor-updates/maiden-copper-gold-mineral-resource-estimate-alford-east-copper-gold-isr-project/
(2)
www.thorenergyplc.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20172018/20180222-clarification-kapunda-copper-resource-estimate.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20172018/20180222-clarification-kapunda-copper-resource-estimate.pdf)
³
www.thorenergyplc.com/sites/thormining/media/aim-report/20190815-initial-copper-resource-estimate---moonta-project---rns---london-stock-exchange.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/aim-report/20190815-initial-copper-resource-estimate---moonta-project---rns---london-stock-exchange.pdf)
(4)
https://thorenergyplc.com/investor-updates/molyhil-project-mineral-resource-estimate-updated/
(5)https://thorenergyplc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221124-8M-Farm-in-Funding-Agreement.pdf
(https://thorenergyplc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221124-8M-Farm-in-Funding-Agreement.pdf)
The Company notes that for the relevant market announcements noted above, that
it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects this
information and that all material assumptions and technical parameters
underpinning any estimates continue to apply and have not materially changed.
APPENDIX 1: The following tables are provided to ensure compliance with JORC
Code (2012) requirements for exploration results for the Wedding Bell and
Radium Mountain Projects in Colorado, USA
JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques · Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific · Samples comprised a combination of rock chips from in-situ exposures
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals and grab samples from historic mullock dumps.
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad · The samples are not considered representative but rather indicative.
meaning of sampling.
· Samples weighed between 1 and 2kg
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. · Mineralisation is characterised by the presence of carnotite,
tyuyamunite and malachite allowing sampling to be guided by visual mineral
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the identification in addition to handheld spectrometer readings
Public Report.
· Edna Mae samples were sent to ALS USA for analysis -4 acid multi
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be element ICP-MS +Uranium (ME-MS61U).
relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire · All other samples sent to Hazen in Denver for Uranium and vanadium
assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there analysis only.
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
Drilling techniques · Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary No drilling reported
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and No drilling reported
results assessed.
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Logging · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and Samples were qualitatively logged.
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
· The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core Samples comprised a combination of rock chips from in-situ exposures and grab
taken. samples from historic mullock dumps.
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and There was no screening or splitting and no QAQC.
whether sampled wet or dry.
The samples are considered adequate to provide indication of presence of
· For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the mineralisation rather than to quantify it.
sample preparation technique.
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the
in situ material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and · Edna Mae samples were sent to ALS Laboratory in Reno, USA for 48 element
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or four acid digest ICP-MS (ME-MS61U).
total.
· All other samples were sent to Hazen, Denver for initial four acid digest
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the with ICP-AES determination for uranium and vanadium only. The laboratory
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and technique is considered total.
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
· Internal laboratory control procedures involved duplicate assaying and
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, internal laboratory standards.
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Verification of sampling and assaying · The verification of significant intersections by either independent or · Sample results are consistent with field observations.
alternative company personnel.
· No drillholes reported.
· The use of twinned holes.
· Primary data was recorded using field note books and GPS digital memory.
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification,
data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. · All data is digitally recorded in the company's electronic database.
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data points · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and · Sample locations were determined by a handheld Garmin 64 GPS with an
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in accuracy of +/-3m.
Mineral Resource estimation.
· Grid system is WGS84 UTM zone 12.
· Specification of the grid system used.
· Topographic control using the GPS is suitable for early- stage exploration.
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacing and distribution · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Data spacing for preliminary exploration work is deemed sufficient on a
first-pass basis to assess areas of potential. Such areas of potential may be
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the further assessed by more detailed work.
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource
and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. · This data will not be used for Mineral Resource Estimation.
· Whether sample compositing has been applied. · There has been no sample compositing.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible Orientational bias is not applicable as no drilling reported.
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit
type.
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of
key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security · The measures taken to ensure sample security. · Samples remained in the custody of the supervising geologist from
collection through to delivery to the assay laboratory.
· Samples are kept in a secure facility.
Audits or reviews · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. None undertaken. Thor's sampling procedure conforms to industry standard
practice and each assay program is reviewed internally for any discrepancies.
1.1Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or Mineral rights are held by the U.S. Government, who transfers those rights to
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, holders of valid mining claims located on open ground through the General
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or Mining Law of 1872, as amended by other Federal, State and County regulations.
national park and environmental settings. Claim holders, with a few exceptions that don't apply to this project, must
make annual payments to the government to maintain their rights. Holder of
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any valid claims can transfer their rights to others. Surface ownership is also by
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. the U.S. and managed by the Bureau of Land Management.
Thor's property position consists of 199 unpatented mining claims (approx.
1,663Ha), registered under US Vanadium Pty Ltd and subsidiaries Standard
Minerals LLC.
If Thor meets its' contractual obligations and keeps the claims in good
standing with the US, then the security of tenure is good.
Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. There are no systems of consistent data archiving for mineral exploration or
exploitation done under the Mining Law on Federal or on other lands within the
State of Colorado. Furthermore, with some exceptions, there was not, nor is
not, a requirement that explorers provide copies of their data to governmental
agencies. That data was retained by private entities. It now exists in a
piecemeal manner, with the data having been discarded, abandoned or available
by vendors that managed to acquire and store some of it over the years.
Thor's properties have bountiful surface evidence of historic drill
exploration, and in some cases, mining exploitation, which appears to be
mostly from the 1950's through the early 1970's. There are several mines
located in the western portion of the property. Unpublished reports list
these mines as producing, in aggregate, over 700,000 lbs (318,181 kg) of
uranium. To the author's knowledge, very little of the historic drilling or
mining data is available to Thor, and certainly not enough to help guide an
exploration program. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some of the work on the
property was done by Union Carbide (now defunct), the largest company that
worked in the Uravan Mineral Belt.
Geology · Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. According to the USGS Bulletin 1693 (Cox, D.P., and Singer, D. A., eds.,
1986), the Deposit Model for the project is Sandstone Uranium - Tabular
subtype.
Drill hole Information · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the Sampling data is report in Table 1 and location maps provided in report.
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion
does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person
should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation methods · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum None used
and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results
and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
· assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
· The values should be clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of All results are rock chip samples
Exploration Results.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle
is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width
not known').
Diagrams · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of Appropriate maps and tables are included in the report.
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not All available results have been reported
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive exploration data · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported No meaningful or material information has been omitted from this release.
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work · The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral · The rock chip sampling suggests that several areas of potentially economic
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step- out drilling). mineralization could be investigated in greater detail.
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including · A couple of these areas have had historic mining in the vicinity. Maps of
the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this where they mined are scarce, so any delineation work needs to be cognisant of
information is not commercially sensitive. that mining.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END MSCFJMMTMTJTTMIRecent news on Thor Energy
See all newsREG - Thor Energy PLC - Director/PDMR Shareholding
AnnouncementREG - AIM - AIM Notice - 26/06/2024
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - Mineralisation at Edna Mae Prospect
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - Result of General Meeting and Total Voting Right
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - Notice of General Meeting
Announcement