REG - Competition and Mkts - CMA settlement with banks in competition case

Royal Bank of CanadaAnnouncement

21/02/2025 08:15

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250221:nRSU9504Xa&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 9504X  Competition and Markets Authority  21 February 2025

 

CMA reaches settlement with banks in competition case

Banks agree to pay fines for past exchanges of sensitive information about UK
government bonds.

·    CMA and 4 banks agree to settle separate cases related to UK
government bonds, known as gilts

·    Citi, HSBC, Morgan Stanley and Royal Bank of Canada will pay fines
totalling over £100 million - Deutsche Bank has immunity for reporting its
conduct which began in 2009 and ended in 2013

·    Individual traders at each of the banks took part in private
one-to-one Bloomberg chatrooms in which they shared sensitive information
relating to buying and selling gilts on specific dates

Gilts are an important type of UK government bond that help to finance public
spending. Investors in gilts lend money to the UK government and in return
receive a steady and stable stream of cash interest payments.

Healthy competition drives investment, innovation and growth, and it is
important that competitors decide their price and strategies independently in
order to ensure effective competition in a market.

Following an investigation
(https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/financial-services-sector-suspected-anti-competitive-practices)
by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the banks have agreed to pay
fines for specific instances in which traders shared competitively sensitive
information about aspects of the pricing of UK bonds. The sharing of
information occurred in one-to-one exchanges between traders about the buying
and selling of gilts and gilt asset swaps.

This conduct took place on various dates between 2009-2013, with the last
exchanges occurring in 2010 for HSBC, 2012 for Morgan Stanley, and 2013 for
each of Citi, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Canada. Since then, the banks
have implemented extensive compliance measures to ensure this behaviour does
not happen again.

Juliette Enser, Executive Director of Competition Enforcement at the CMA,
said:

"Following constructive engagement between the banks and the CMA, we are
pleased that we have been able to settle these 5 cases involving the past
sharing of competitively sensitive information about pricing.

"The financial services sector is an integral part of the UK economy,
contributing billions every year, and it's essential that it functions
effectively. Only through healthy and competitive markets can we ensure
businesses and investors have confidence to invest and grow - for the benefit
of all in the UK.

"The fines imposed today reflect the CMA's commitment to dealing with
competition law breaches and deterring anti-competitive conduct. The fines
would have been substantially higher had the banks not already taken unusually
extensive steps to make sure that this doesn't happen again."

Unlawful exchanges in one-to-one chatrooms

Each of the exchanges took place in separate bilateral online Bloomberg
chatrooms between individual traders at 2 banks [see Figure 1] and included
information relevant to the pricing of UK government bonds - specifically,
gilts and gilt asset swaps.

In particular, each one-to-one exchange of information took place in relation
to one or more of the following: firstly, the sale of gilts by the UK Debt
Management Office via auctions on behalf of HM Treasury, secondly the
subsequent buying and selling, i.e. trading, of gilts and gilt asset swaps,
and thirdly the selling of gilts to the Bank of England - known as 'buy back'.
Not all banks were involved in unlawful exchanges in all 3 contexts.

 

Figure 1 - Parties to the separate one-to-one exchanges

Consequences

Four banks - Citi, HSBC, Morgan Stanley and Royal Bank of Canada - have
settled and agreed to pay fines totalling £104,460,000.

Deutsche Bank is exempt from a financial penalty as it alerted the CMA to its
participation in the chats via the authority's leniency policy. Citi applied
for leniency during the CMA's investigation and as a result has received a
reduced fine.

In agreeing to settle with the CMA, the banks have agreed to pay these fines,
bringing the investigation to a close.

The fines for each bank are:

·    Citi: £17,160,000 - this includes a 35% leniency discount and a 20%
reduction for settling in advance of the CMA issuing its Statement of
Objections

·    HSBC: £23,400,000 - this includes a 10% reduction for settling after
the CMA issued its Statement of Objections

·    Morgan Stanley: £29,700,000 - this includes a 10% reduction for
settling after the CMA issued its Statement of Objections

·    Royal Bank of Canada: £34,200,000 - this includes a 10% reduction
for settling after the CMA issued its Statement of Objections

The fines take into account the length of time that has passed since the end
of the infringements and the extensive compliance measures that the banks have
implemented since then - some of which were in place before the start of the
CMA's investigation.

The firms have until 22 April 2025 to pay their fines.

More information on this investigation and the CMA's update is available on
the UK government bonds: suspected anti-competitive arrangements case page
(https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/financial-services-sector-suspected-anti-competitive-practices)
.

Notes to editors

1.   A gilt is a UK government bond issued by HM Treasury through the UK
Debt Management Office ('DMO'). This case concerned conventional gilts only,
i.e. gilts that pay a fixed rate of interest to the holder. Gilts are commonly
issued through auction by the DMO in the UK to gilt-edged market makers
('GEMMs') and are actively traded in the financial market following issuance.
All 5 banks investigated by the CMA are GEMMs.

2.   In 2009, in response to the financial crisis, the Bank of England
adopted a quantitative easing ('QE') policy, which involved the Bank of
England buying assets - the majority of which were gilts. The Bank of England
therefore conducted regular buy-back auctions at certain points during the
relevant period.

3.   The DMO, the Bank of England and HM Treasury were not under
investigation. The DMO, on behalf of HM Treasury, and the Bank of England have
assisted the CMA with the investigation by responding to information requests.

4.   The CMA has issued five separate bilateral infringement decisions.
Decision documents are addressed to the following entities: Citigroup Global
Markets Limited and its ultimate parent company Citigroup Inc. (together
'Citi'), Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft ('Deutsche Bank'), HSBC Bank Plc and
its ultimate parent company HSBC Holdings Plc (together 'HSBC'), Morgan
Stanley & Co. International Plc and its ultimate parent company Morgan
Stanley (together 'Morgan Stanley'), and RBC Europe Limited and its ultimate
parent company Royal Bank of Canada (together 'Royal Bank of Canada').

5.   In each decision, the CMA has found a single and repeated 'by object'
infringement (i.e. that the conduct had, as its object, the restriction or
distortion of competition within the UK). The CMA has not made any finding as
to whether the conduct at issue had the effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition.

6.   The information exchanges took place between:

·    Citi and Deutsche Bank: on 12 specific dates between July 2012 and
January 2013

·    Citi and Morgan Stanley: on 3 specific dates between December 2011
and February 2012

·    Deutsche Bank and HSBC: on 12 specific dates between October 2009 and
June 2010

·    Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley: on 8 specific dates between October
2009 and June 2011

·    Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Canada: on 41 specific dates between
November 2009 and April 2013

7.   In the case of 4 of the banks (Citi, Deutsche Bank, HSBC and Morgan
Stanley) the information was exchanged by a single trader based in the UK. In
the case of the Royal Bank of Canada, the information was exchanged on
different occasions by 2 traders based in the UK. None of the traders remain
employed by the bank they worked for at the time.

8.   Bloomberg chatrooms are a means of electronic communication through
which participants can exchange messages. Although the information exchanged
through certain Bloomberg chatrooms formed part of the CMA's investigation,
Bloomberg was not under investigation.

9.   All banks were involved in unlawful exchanges relating to trading. In
addition, Citi, Deutsche Bank, HSBC and Morgan Stanley were involved in
unlawful exchanges relating to auctions; and Deutsche Bank, Citi and Morgan
Stanley were involved in unlawful exchanges relating to buy-back auctions.
Deutsche Bank and RBC also coordinated their strategies for trading gilts via
brokers on a limited number of occasions.

10. Under the CMA's leniency policy
(https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cartels-confess-and-apply-for-leniency) , a
business that has been involved in cartel activity may be granted immunity
from penalties or a reduction in penalty in return for reporting the cartel
activity and assisting the CMA with its investigation.

11. A party under investigation by the CMA may enter into a settlement
agreement if it is prepared to admit that it has breached competition law, is
willing to pay a fine and agree to a streamlined administrative procedure for
the remainder of the investigation. Settlement can take place before or after
the CMA issues a Statement of Objections, which sets out the CMA's provisional
findings of fact and its legal and economic assessment of them.

12. The CMA and the Financial Conduct Authority have concurrent functions to
enforce competition law in the financial services sector. It was agreed that
the CMA would exercise those functions in relation to this investigation.

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  STCXBLLLELLBBBK