This week I want to return to my back-to-basics theme, with a look at a simple set of rules that might be used to help find good small-cap stocks. The smaller end of the stock market can be a fertile hunting ground for growth stocks and potential multibaggers, as Ed discussed in his recent webinar and masterclasses.
(In the previous instalment of this mini-series, I created a simple screen to help find good dividend stocks – you can find that here.)
It’s easy to build more complicated screens with lots of rules – and that’s something I quite like to do. But I’ve often found that after a while, there can sometimes be a certain amount of overlap and redundancy between rules.
Screens can also become too exclusive, as good companies don’t necessarily fit an exact financial profile.
On a related note, it’s worth remembering that screen results are always best used as a tool to narrow down the market and provide ideas for further research. With this in mind, I think there’s some value in trying to distil what we’re looking for to its simplest form.
Given the historical success rate of the StockRanks, I also think it makes sense to leverage this powerful tool when building a screen. That’s what I’ve done here.
Here’s a snapshot of the rules I’ve created and a look at some of the shares highlighted by the screen.
My easy small-cap screen
The idea was to create enough rules to capture some essential qualities, without including anything unnecessary.
In this case, I asked myself what the absolute minimum criteria would be that I’d associate with a good small-cap stock. I’m not looking for outliers here, such as turnarounds or special situations. What I want are profitable, growing businesses, without too many complications or obvious risks.
Here’s what I decided:
Market cap: the definition of a small cap tends to vary, depending on who you ask. In US markets, small caps also tend to be larger than in the UK.
I’ve chosen a range of £25m - £750m because I think this covers a range that has historically been rich with opportunity, without being too speculative. Companies in this size range are small enough to multibag, but should also be reasonably well established.
StockRank: in Ed’s…